Post by account_disabled on Jan 27, 2024 6:25:58 GMT 2
Vargas Llosa and Mariano Rajoy support Milei in defense of the Argentine people. Apparently they know better what interests them and that impels them to exercise this political paternalism. Ayuso also appreciates that Freedom in capital letters that the Buenos Aires billionaire preaches. As in many other places around the globe, a large part of the citizens share the criticism of an economic system that continues to fail miserably and means that large sections of the population are limited to surviving with serious economic difficulties. Having to endorse the economic minister who has an enormous responsibility in this mess is a bad pill to swallow.
The bad thing is that his opponent does not put evaluable solutions on the table, because he only proposes blowing up absolutely everything, without clarifying what exactly will happen after the demolition. The debate between Phone Number Database both presidential candidates, broadcast on television with a lot of follow-up, is more like a contest in which whoever utters the most disqualifications and expletives aims to win . It is enough to accuse the other of being a liar to certify that you are telling the truth and you blurt out Pinocchio by gouging out your eye to distract the public. You can take these reasonings already prepared from home and release them regardless of what your interlocutor tells you. It is a tactic well known to those who cultivate Trumpism.
Why are you going to go to the trouble of proposing absolutely nothing, if it is enough to insistently and forcefully repeat whatever you want to cajole those who may believe it. Let us cry for Argentina as a symbol of the global theft of politics and ask ourselves why Rajoy decides to support Milei Listening to Milei's witticisms, whose sanity perhaps should be tested, makes you want to cry in a double sense. First because you burst out laughing, as if you were attending a comedy show. Then you remember that this is serious and it's not funny at all. Then you have to suppress crying in the face of a situation that is too general. The exchange of politics for an unsustainable populist demagogy that triumphs today at the expense of tomorrow.
The bad thing is that his opponent does not put evaluable solutions on the table, because he only proposes blowing up absolutely everything, without clarifying what exactly will happen after the demolition. The debate between Phone Number Database both presidential candidates, broadcast on television with a lot of follow-up, is more like a contest in which whoever utters the most disqualifications and expletives aims to win . It is enough to accuse the other of being a liar to certify that you are telling the truth and you blurt out Pinocchio by gouging out your eye to distract the public. You can take these reasonings already prepared from home and release them regardless of what your interlocutor tells you. It is a tactic well known to those who cultivate Trumpism.
Why are you going to go to the trouble of proposing absolutely nothing, if it is enough to insistently and forcefully repeat whatever you want to cajole those who may believe it. Let us cry for Argentina as a symbol of the global theft of politics and ask ourselves why Rajoy decides to support Milei Listening to Milei's witticisms, whose sanity perhaps should be tested, makes you want to cry in a double sense. First because you burst out laughing, as if you were attending a comedy show. Then you remember that this is serious and it's not funny at all. Then you have to suppress crying in the face of a situation that is too general. The exchange of politics for an unsustainable populist demagogy that triumphs today at the expense of tomorrow.